| The Theory of Constraints And Bottleneck
Identification |
By
Issa Bass
The
Theory Of Constraints was first introduced in 1985 (just a few years
before Six Sigma) by Eliyahu Goldratt in his famous book the Goal
and later developed in his subsequent books such as “The Critical
Chain”, “It’s Not Luck”, “the Haystack Syndrome”
and “The Theory Of Constraints”.
It is founded on the notion that in any business structure, at
any given time, one factor tends to impede the company’s ability to
reach its full potential. All business operations are structured
like a chain of events, like linked processes with each process
being a dependent link and at any given time, one link
on the chain tends to restrain the whole chain and prevent it from
reaching its Goal. Since the objective of a company is not to
maximize the efficiency of the different parts that compose it, but
to maximize the overall efficiency of the business as an entity,
it becomes necessary to identify the constraint and proceed with
the needed improvements.
One of the first lessons that Goldratt gives in The Goals is
an obvious one, even thought some businesses fail to understand it:
Companies do not exist for the sake of being productive or for the
sake of producing high quality goods and services or making their
customers happy. The reason why companies are set up, their
raison d’etre, their Goal is to make profit, to
make money. Productivity, high quality products and services
and customer satisfaction are nothing but very necessary ways
and means that companies have to use to reach their Goal. So
the cost of being productive, the cost of quality and customer
satisfaction must be contingent upon the Goal.
In his quest to
show the ways and means to reach the Goal, Goldratt borrows some
commonly used business terms but he gives them a different meaning.
Three of the most important of which are the Throughput, Inventory
and Operational Expenses which he defines as follow.
·
Throughput:
Money generated by a company through sales
·
Inventory:
Money invested on purchasing things intended for sales
·
Operational
Expenses: Money spent to turn Inventory into
Throughput.
Some of the
derivatives of these metrics are the Throughput Per Unit and the
Throughput Per Unit of the Constraining factor.
·
Throughput Per Unit
= Throughput /( units of Product)
·
Throughput Per Unit of the Constraining Factor
= (Throughput Per Unit) / (units of the constraining factor required
to produce each unit of product).
To maximizing
total Throughput, The Company must concentrate on improving the
sales of the products that provide the highest throughput per unit
of the constraining factor. This is because the bottleneck
determines the throughput.
The objective of a company must be to maximize the Throughput by
minimizing the Inventory and the Operational Expenses. To reach that
objective, it must continuously strive to identify the Constraints,
the Bottlenecks and proceed with the necessary changes. The
bottleneck is defined as a resource whose capacity is equal to or is
less than the demand placed on it. The slowest performing area in
a process determines the level of output generated by that process.
To
make the necessary changes, the company needs first, to answer the
following three questions:
·
What to change?
·
What to change to?
·
How to make the change happen?
The changes that
need to be made must address the area of the business that
constitutes the bottleneck; Overlooking the interactions between the
different departments in a company and only improving on areas that
are perceived to constitute constraints might only address
the symptoms and in some cases aggravate the problems.
To make the
necessary changes, Goldratt suggests the 5 following steps:
1.
Identify the constraint
2.
Exploit the constraint
3.
Subordinate all other operations to the necessity to exploit
the constraint
4.
Elevate the constraint if after exploiting it and
subordinating all other operations to it, more capacity is needed to
meet market demand.
5.
Restart the process without letting inertia become the
system’s constraint. The process needs to be restarted again and
again until the current constraint is no longer the constraint.
The way we can
tell that the current constraint is no longer the constraint is that
when further changes are made on the current constraint, they do not
positively impact the bottom line of the company as a whole.
Therefore another process, another department, another link must
have become the weakest link, the new constraint, and it needs
improvement.
About the author
Issa Bass is the managing editor
of SixSigmaFirst. He can be reached
at
issa@sixsigmafirst.com
Tell us what you think
about this article. Send a
note to the Editor.
A
Combination Of Six Sigma, Lean, TOC And The Use of Triz Can Lead To
A Radical Process Improvement
TOC can be helpful since it
is about identifying
bottlenecks and improving
them for a continuous
improvement. The identification of the bottlenecks
may require value stream and process mapping. Once the bottlenecks are
identified, a Six Sigma project would be an effective tool to
improve on them and TRIZ techniques can efficiently speed up
contradiction resolutions and help save resources. By Issa Bass
Map Your Value Stream Before Selecting Your Six
Sigma Project
Just as in the case of process mapping, the purpose of value stream
mapping is to visualize the chain of events that leads to the generation
of a throughput in order to pin point a bottleneck, a clutter or
opportunities for
improvement. Yet it is
necessary to distinguish Value Stream Mapping from Process mapping since
a value stream is a chain of processes. By Issa Bass
|
External Resources for the Theory Of
Constraints |
What is the Theory Of Constraints
How to Compare Six Sigma, Lean and the Theory Of Constraints
A Guide to Implementing the Theory of Constraints (TOC)
Theory Of Constraints and Six Sigma Better Together
|